全球最薄智能手机的电池续航时间令人难以置信--Oppo Find N5 评测不是 OnePlus Open 2。 Oppo Find N5 是世界上最薄的可折叠智能手机，但尽管设计纤薄，它也有一些局限性。这款可折叠手机配备了骁龙8精英处理器、潜望式摄像头和超大电池。Oppo 是否已经在强调Galaxy Z Fold 7 所不能提供的功能？Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 03/31/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇭🇺 🇵🇱 🇷🇺 5G Foldable Touchscreen Smartphone
OPPO Find N5 的评价凭借其纤薄轻巧的设计，Oppo 成功地将 Find N3 打造成了一款近乎完美的经典智能手机。此外，它还拥有 8.12 英寸屏幕的显著优势。Find N5 不仅是世界上最薄的可折叠手机，而且由于采用了 OPPO 的 "抗衰老处理 "技术，它还与其他可折叠手机一样没有褶皱。
除了出色的用户体验，Oppo 还内置了大量强大的硬件。7 核版本的骁龙 8 精英版虽然在性能上弱于标准版，但仍能提供高水平的性能。此外，手写笔支持、出色的扬声器和明亮的显示屏也是 Find N5 的优势所在。尽管与前代产品相比重量有所减轻，但 OPPO 仍设法大幅增加了电池容量，从而实现了几乎超越竞争对手的出色电池续航时间。
Test device courtesy of Trading Shenzhen
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
由于设计原因，与高端竞争产品相比，买家无疑不得不接受一些限制。摄像头不是顶级的，高节流也不是完美的。我们还怀念 6 GHz Wi-Fi 频段和透明的选材。Find N2 的外形设计在日常生活中更加实用，我们也欢迎下一代 Oppo 可折叠设备采用这种外形设计，使其拥有独特的卖点。
Pros+ 轻薄
+ 防水外壳
+ 明亮的 OLED 面板
+ 无恼人的显示屏折痕
+ 电池寿命长
+ 高性能Cons- ......高级节流
- CN 版本的限制（无 eSIM，...）
- 只能导入
价格和供应情况Oppo Find N5 的全球版本配备 16 GB 内存和 512 GB 闪存，售价约为 1,789 美元。中国版 OPPO 手机在深圳交易市场的起价为 1594 元。据我们目前所知，全球版本也不会在欧洲推出。
Table of ContentsOPPO Find N5 的评价Oppo Find N5 规格手机壳 - Oppo 智能手机薄得令人难以置信功能 - Find N5 有一个 USB 端口软件 - 可折叠手机配备Android 15通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Oppo Find N5 配备了 WiFi 7电话功能和语音质量 - 双卡双待的可折叠智能手机摄像头 - Oppo 手机采用哈苏品牌配件和保修 - Oppo Find N5 附带一个充电器输入设备和操作 - 可折叠手机使用面部解锁功能显示屏 - Oppo 采用 OLED 面板性能 - 配备高通 SoC 的可折叠手机游戏 - Oppo Find N5 只能达到 90fps排放 - Oppo 智能手机有一个热点电池续航时间 - Oppo Find N5 充电迅速Notebookcheck 总体评分
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
凭借 Find N5，Oppo 取代Honor Magic V3 成为全球最薄的可折叠手机。不过，除了极致纤薄的外壳，它还提供了令人兴奋的功能：Oppo 手机配备 8.12 英寸显示屏，使用 5,600 毫安时电池，这意味着该储能设备存储的电量比 Magic V3 的电池多出近 30%。 三星Galaxy Z Fold 6.
由于采用了 高通骁龙8精英版以及配备潜望式长焦镜头的哈苏三摄像头。与前代产品不同，Find N5 不会以 OnePlus Open 2 的身份在欧洲发布。
Oppo Find N5 规格
Oppo Find N5 (Find N Series)ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2, 7 Core versionGraphics adapterQualcomm Adreno 830Memory12 GB , LPDDR5xDisplay8.12 inch 9.9:9, 2480 x 2248 pixel 412 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, AMOLED, outer Screen: 6.62-inch, 2.616 x 1.140, 120 Hz, Oppo pen support, HDR, 120 HzStorage512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB , 458 GB freeConnections1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB Type C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, barometer, OTG, MiracastNetworkingWi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n25/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 4.21 x 160.87 x 146.58Battery5600 mAh Silicon-CarbonChargingwireless charging, fast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 15CameraPrimary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.89, OIS, videos @2160p/60fps); 50 MPix (f/2.7, OIS, periscope-telephoto lens) + 8 MPix (f/2.2, OIS, wide-angle lens)Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.4, videos @2160p/30fps, front camera); 8 MPix (f/2.4, inner camera)Additional featuresSpeakers: Stereo, charger, USB cable, case, Color OS, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, GNSS: GPS (L1/L5), GLONASS, BeiDou (B1I/B1C/B2a), Galileo (E1/E5a), QZSS (L1/L5), fanless, waterproofWeight229 g, Power Supply: 106 g
Price1577 EuroNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
手机壳 - Oppo 智能手机薄得令人难以置信Oppo Find N5 的颜色选择 Find N5 的外壳厚度仅为 4.56 毫米，是可折叠市场上最薄的手机。折叠后的厚度为 8.9 毫米，Oppo 手机几乎不比传统智能手机厚。重量方面也是如此，Oppo 将其 XXL 可折叠设备的重量减至 229 克，仅比Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 的 227 克重一些。这主要是通过使用新开发的钛金属铰链实现的。
钛合金挠性铰链在日常使用中感觉坚固耐用，具有良好的刚性。其耐用性已通过德国莱茵 TÜV 认证。除了精美的设计和窄显示屏边框外，Find N5 还具有 IPX9 防水认证，并散发出高级感。Find N5 还配备了 OnePlus 智能手机特有的提醒滑动按钮，可用于通知静音。
正面的显示屏由经典的纳米水晶玻璃保护，内部面板则采用了肖特UTG 特殊玻璃，其表层由专门开发的抗震弹性材料制成。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
尺寸比较
Oppo Find N5 Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Honor Magic V3 Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Oppo Find N3 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 DIN A6 ❌
功能 - Find N5 有一个 USB 端口总体而言，这家中国制造商的可折叠设备具有出色的功能设置，包括蓝牙 5.4、USB OTG、红外爆破器、Miracast 和近场通信。据 OPPO 称，NFC 芯片会对收集到的人工智能和用户数据进行加密，并通过额外的安全芯片防止数据被盗。快速 USB 3.2 端口还支持有线图像输出。
值得一提的是，它还兼容 iOS 和 iPadOS 设备，可以无缝共享照片、视频和文件。通过 "O+ Connect "应用程序，Find N5 还可用作键盘、触控板和外置多点触摸屏。
机身底部侧面（麦克风、USB 端口、扬声器、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽）
机壳右侧（按钮：音量、开/关机、警报滑块）
顶盖侧面（麦克风、红外热像仪、扬声器）
机箱顶侧（铰链）
软件 - 可折叠手机配备Android 15Find N5 搭载了Android 15，并辅以该公司的 ColorOS 15。根据制造商的说法，这款可折叠手机将获得五年的安全更新，但 OPPO 没有透露你可以期待多少次Android 升级。因此，更新支持令人满意，但三星和谷歌已经表明，更长时间的更新是可能的。
当然，人工智能也是 ColorOS 的必备功能。第 15 版包含全新的 AI 搜索和众多 AI 功能，如 AI 通话摘要和 AI 照片编辑。此外，非常实用的 "无界视图 "功能也加入其中，该功能允许在显示屏边界之外同时使用三个应用程序。其他制造商应该立即从中得到启发。
可持续性Find N5 的包装不含塑料，采用大豆油墨印刷。根据制造商的可持续发展报告，包装中使用的纤维有 45% 来自回收材料。我们没有发现可折叠设备本身使用回收材料的相关信息。用户的可修复性也不是重点，而且很难验证。在透明度方面，Oppo 还有很多工作要做。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Oppo Find N5 配备了 WiFi 7无论您选择的是中国版还是全球版，Oppo 可折叠手机在无线频段方面都配备齐全，可以在德语国家无损使用。在 Wi-Fi 连接方面，Find N5 采用了当前的 Wi-Fi 7 标准，提供了最好的无线连接，但遗憾的是，我们的中国版本无法使用 6 GHz 频道建立连接。因此，我们在使用 Wi-Fi 6E 参考路由器时只使用了 2.4 和 5 GHz 频段。
华硕 ROG Rapture GT AXE11000 的传输速度并不稳定，但我们在接收数据时测得的峰值接近 1,800 Mbps。不过，Find N5 在发送数据时速度明显较慢。
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000Oppo Find N3Wi-Fi 7
1495 (709min - 1727max) MBit/s +119%Average Wi-Fi 7 (556 - 1806, n=59)
1015 MBit/s +49%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldWi-Fi 7
969 (909min - 998max) MBit/s +42%Honor Magic V3Wi-Fi 7
919 (808min - 971max) MBit/s +35%Average of class Smartphone (49.8 - 1806, n=181, last 2 years)
724 MBit/s +6%Oppo Find N5Wi-Fi 7
682 (502min, 506.93P1 - 851max) MBit/s Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Wi-Fi 7
632 MBit/s -7%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
531 (263min - 608max) MBit/s -22% iperf3 receive AXE11000Oppo Find N3Wi-Fi 7
1733 (1600min - 1830max) MBit/s +11%Oppo Find N5Wi-Fi 7
1562 (1218min, 1249.03P1 - 1772max) MBit/s Average Wi-Fi 7 (565 - 1875, n=59)
1014 MBit/s -35%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldWi-Fi 7
893 (418min - 933max) MBit/s -43%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Wi-Fi 7
892 MBit/s -43%Honor Magic V3Wi-Fi 7
771 (387min - 800max) MBit/s -51%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
761 (683min - 800max) MBit/s -51%Average of class Smartphone (52 - 1857, n=181, last 2 years)
736 MBit/s -53% iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHzGoogle Pixel 9 Pro FoldWi-Fi 7
1845 (924min - 1886max) MBit/s Average Wi-Fi 7 (563 - 1945, n=46)
1527 MBit/s Average of class Smartphone (508 - 1945, n=81, last 2 years)
1381 MBit/s Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
770 (402min - 836max) MBit/s Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Wi-Fi 7
632 (569min - 679max) MBit/s iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHzGoogle Pixel 9 Pro FoldWi-Fi 7
1843 (1524min - 1885max) MBit/s Average Wi-Fi 7 (451 - 1864, n=46)
1515 MBit/s Average of class Smartphone (451 - 1864, n=81, last 2 years)
1400 MBit/s Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1365 (1221min - 1406max) MBit/s Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Wi-Fi 7
892 (720min - 981max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø632 (569-679) Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø892 (720-981) Oppo Find N5 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø682 (502-851) Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø632 (569-679) Oppo Find N5 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1562 (1218-1772) Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø892 (720-981)
室内定位
户外定位 在一次骑行中，我们将 Find N5 的跟踪性能与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。Oppo 手机使用双频 GNSS 定位，精确度在 3 米以内。测得的总距离与 Garmin 智能手表非常相似，在详细的路线中也只能发现细微的偏差。
Garmin Venu 2
Oppo Find N5
电话功能和语音质量 - 双卡双待的可折叠智能手机
选择全球版 Find N5 的用户可以选择在系统中集成 eSIM 卡。然而，中国版的 Color OS 却不提供这一功能。不过，Find N5 支持双卡双待，还支持 Wi-Fi 通话和 VoLTE。
听筒的通话质量非常令人满意，尽管我们的通话对象有时听起来有点闷。
摄像头 - Oppo 手机采用哈苏品牌尽管采用了超薄设计，Oppo 还是为 Find N5 的哈苏品牌三摄像头配备了光学防抖功能。不过，对于一款可折叠设备来说，还是不得不做出一些妥协。例如，5000 万像素主摄像头传感器的 1/1.56 英寸规格相当小，但这并不影响日光下的照片质量。特别是考虑到前代产品采用了更大的传感器，升级到索尼 LYT700 并不理想。但即使在黑暗环境中，Oppo 手机仍能以较低的噪点水平保留 Find N5 图像中的大量细节。
主摄像头自拍 用内部摄像头自拍 前置摄像头自拍 潜望镜相机配备了 5000 万像素的高分辨率传感器，在光线充足的情况下也能获得良好的拍摄效果。它的无损放大倍数为 3 倍，还能进行远摄微距拍摄。用于拍摄超广角照片的 800 万像素镜头稍显不足，在测试照片中出现了明显的模糊和一些图像伪影。
0.6x1x2x3x虽然 Find N5 的主摄像头可实现 10 位视频，包括杜比视界和高达 4K 分辨率、每秒 60 帧的详细记录，但在视频过程中更换主体只能在 4K30 下实现 HDR。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide-angleLow lightclick to load imagesOppo Find N5Oppo Find X8 ProApple iPhone 16 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesOppo Find N5Oppo Find X8 ProApple iPhone 16 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesOppo Find N5Oppo Find X8 ProApple iPhone 16 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesOppo Find N5Oppo Find X8 ProApple iPhone 16 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
在受控的照明条件下，我们分析了主相机的色彩还原与实际参考色彩的对比情况。ColorChecker 通行证中的 5000 万像素镜头显示曝光过度，尤其是在明亮的色彩中。我们发现 Find N5 在色彩保真度方面存在一些异常值（>10）。
9.4 ∆E10 ∆E12.4 ∆E10.4 ∆E11.7 ∆E8 ∆E10.2 ∆E7.5 ∆E9 ∆E2.5 ∆E8 ∆E7.2 ∆E5.4 ∆E8.1 ∆E7.9 ∆E2.3 ∆E8.5 ∆E8.6 ∆E6.4 ∆E6.5 ∆E7.3 ∆E6.1 ∆E2.5 ∆E5.4 ∆EColorChecker Oppo Find N5: 7.56 ∆E min: 2.3 - max: 12.36 ∆E29 ∆E49.1 ∆E35.1 ∆E33.9 ∆E39.2 ∆E55.3 ∆E47.9 ∆E27.7 ∆E37.8 ∆E26.4 ∆E57.3 ∆E59.4 ∆E25 ∆E42.5 ∆E33.5 ∆E67.4 ∆E38.9 ∆E39.3 ∆E61.5 ∆E62.6 ∆E48.7 ∆E35.5 ∆E23.3 ∆E13.5 ∆EColorChecker Oppo Find N5: 41.22 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 67.44 ∆E
Oppo Find N5Oppo Find N5
配件和保修 - Oppo Find N5 附带一个充电器Find N5 充电器 我们的中文版配有一个 80 瓦的快速充电电源适配器、一条数据/充电线（USB-C 转 USB-A）、一个 SIM 卡针、一份快速入门指南和一个保护套。两块屏幕上还安装了塑料薄膜，并随附一个保护套。我们的设备贷方 Trading Shenzhen 还为随附的额外物品增加了一个欧盟充电器适配器和一个 USB OTG 适配器。
我们的进口设备享有 12 个月的保修服务。如果需要保修，Trading Shenzhen 可以选择将智能手机运送到德国地址。
输入设备和操作 - 可折叠手机使用面部解锁功能两块 OLED 触摸屏的采样率高达 240 Hz，可快速响应手指输入。得益于 120 Hz 的面板，动画也能流畅显示，而且两个面板都支持 Oppo Pen。Oppo 还为其可折叠手机提供了三星的 Flex 模式，即折叠后的扩展显示屏选项。
Find N5 的外屏纵横比为 20.7:9，可以像传统智能手机一样使用。这款可折叠手机拥有 8.12 英寸的大屏幕，也为多任务处理提供了足够的空间。不过，潜在买家在购买前应注意，由于长宽比不同寻常，大屏幕不太适合使用应用程序。
指纹传感器集成在电源按钮上。它的位置有点高，但解锁 OPPO 手机非常可靠。此外，还可以使用使用 800 万像素摄像头的相当不安全的 2D 面部识别系统。
▶ load Youtube video
显示屏 - Oppo 采用 OLED 面板两种 OLED 显示器都使用 RG/BG 子像素矩阵，每个矩阵由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色 LED 组成Find N5 的可折叠双屏蔽柔性显示屏分辨率为 412 PPI，对角线为 8.12 英寸，这使得这款 OPPO 手机的屏幕面积略大于竞争对手。此外，由于我们在日常使用中无法察觉到任何明显的褶皱，因此内部面板看起来几乎没有褶皱。该制造商还宣称其可折叠手机获得了德国莱茵 TÜV 的 "最小褶皱 "认证。
在我们的测量中，120 Hz LTPO 面板的峰值亮度达到 2,026 cd/m²²（APL18）。为了在观看闪烁的 OLED 面板时保护眼睛，当屏幕亮度低于 70 尼特时，Oppo 使用高频 PWM 调光（2,160 Hz）。使用示波器，Find N5 在较高亮度下的闪烁频率为 120 Hz，随着亮度的增加，频率增至 240 Hz。
Inner display brightness
1189cd/m²1156cd/m²1167cd/m²1202cd/m²1240cd/m²1198cd/m²1126cd/m²1154cd/m²1178cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 2 (inner display)Maximum: 1240 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1178.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.1 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 91 %Center on Battery: 1240 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE Color 1.36 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.09-98 Ø5.199.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.239
Oppo Find N5AMOLED, 2480x2248, 8.1"Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldOLED LTPO, 2152x2076, 8"Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6AMOLED, HDR - HDR10+, HGL, 2nd Screen: 6.3", 2376x968, Glass Victus 2, 2160x1856, 7.6"Xiaomi Mix Fold 4AMOLED LPTO, 2488x2224, 8"Honor Magic V3OLED, 2344x2156, 7.9"Oppo Find N3OLED, 2440x2268, 7.8"Screen19%10%-44%10%3%Brightness middle12401793 45%1396 13%1111 -10%1019 -18%1283 3%Brightness11791599 36%1387 18%1120 -5%1032 -12%1290 9%Brightness Distribution9166 -27%89 -2%99 9%95 4%98 8%Black Level *Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.360.9 34%1.7 -25%3.42 -151%1 26%1.5 -10%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *3.063.1 -1%2.5 18%5.92 -93%2.2 28%3.4 -11%Greyscale dE 2000 *2.41.7 29%1.5 37%2.7 -13%1.7 29%2 17%Gamma2.239 98%2.19 100%2.16 102%2.206 100%2.26 97%2.26 97%CCT6353 102%6714 97%6495 100%7081 92%6473 100%6435 101%* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 HzAmplitude: 18 %The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8350 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
最低亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度 使用固定变焦级别和各种亮度设置进行一系列测量。
我们使用卡尔曼分析软件和照相光谱仪对色彩校准进行了测试。自然配置文件使用的是 DCI P3，而 Find N5 在专业配置文件中使用的是较小的 sRGB 色彩空间。在我们的测量中，后者的色彩保真度最高，偏差明显在目标范围内（<3）。
色彩准确度（配置文件：专业版目标色彩空间：sRGB） - 内部显示屏
色彩空间（配置文件：专业版目标色彩空间：sRGB） - 内部显示
色彩空间（配置文件：Pro 目标色彩空间：P3） - 内部显示
色彩空间（配置文件：专业版目标色彩空间：sRGB） - 内部显示
灰度（配置文件：Pro 目标色彩空间：sRGB） - 内部显示
色彩饱和度（配置文件：Pro 目标色彩空间：sRGB） - 内部显示屏
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6 ms rise↘ 0.7 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7 ms rise↘ 1.7 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).
虽然主显示屏上的塑料薄膜反光明显，但无论使用哪种面板，Oppo 手机在户外都给人留下了极好的印象。不过，视角稳定性非常好，亮度下降也很小。
外部显示屏 副显示屏采用 6.62 英寸 AMOLED 面板，峰值亮度同样为 2,198 cd/m² (APL18)。与主屏幕一样，由于采用了 LTPO 技术，刷新率在 1 到 120 Hz 之间变化。外屏分辨率为 2,616 x 1,140 像素，像素密度为 431 PPI。
Outer display brightness
1324cd/m²1322cd/m²1305cd/m²1356cd/m²1358cd/m²1348cd/m²1299cd/m²1309cd/m²1328cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 1358 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1327.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.98 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 96 %Center on Battery: 1358 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE Color 1.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.09-98 Ø5.199.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.213
色彩准确度（配置文件：专业版目标色彩空间：sRGB） - 外部显示屏
色彩空间（配置文件：Pro 目标色彩空间：Adobe RGB） - 外部显示
色彩空间（配置文件：Pro 目标色彩空间：P3） - 外部显示
色彩空间（配置文件：专业版目标色彩空间：sRGB） - 外部显示器
灰度（配置文件：Pro 目标色彩空间：sRGB） - 外部显示屏
色彩饱和度（配置文件：Pro 目标色彩空间：sRGB） - 外部显示屏性能 - 配备高通 SoC 的可折叠手机Find N5 是首款搭载 骁龙 8 精英版不过，这里只使用了具有五个性能核心的版本，而不是六个。这意味着，高通公司在生产过程中很可能也会将一个内核存在缺陷的问题芯片纳入其中，并以较低的价格销售。
不过，这并不影响日常性能；即使同时使用多个应用程序，Oppo 手机仍能提供足够的性能储备。不过，基准测试结果却有些不同。在 Geekbench 多核测试中，缺失的核心尤为明显，而在 Geekbench AI 测试中，由于结果不佳，NPU 也可能受到了影响。
Geekbench 6.4 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark Geekbench 6.4
Single-CoreAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (2309 - 3228, n=20)
3022 Points +5%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2888 Points Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2239 Points -22%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2184 Points -24%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2170 Points -25%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1359 Points -53%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1982 Points -31%Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3479, n=204, last 2 years)
1607 Points -44%Oppo Find N3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1534 Points -47% Multi-CoreAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (7784 - 10401, n=20)
9198 Points +12%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
8243 Points Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
6894 Points -16%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6794 Points -18%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6279 Points -24%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
4882 Points -41%Oppo Find N3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
4987 Points -40%Average of class Smartphone (830 - 10401, n=204, last 2 years)
4631 Points -44%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4536 Points -45%Geekbench 5.5
Single-CoreAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (2099 - 2276, n=10)
2198 Points +5%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2099 Points Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1689 Points -20%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1651 Points -21%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1374 Points -35%Average of class Smartphone (145 - 2437, n=149, last 2 years)
1143 Points -46% Multi-CoreAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (6384 - 8816, n=10)
7583 Points +12%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
6765 Points Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
5899 Points -13%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
5898 Points -13%Average of class Smartphone (550 - 8816, n=149, last 2 years)
3880 Points -43%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
3874 Points -43%Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (2340778 - 3015111, n=15)
2698774 Points +15%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2340778 Points Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1934541 Points -17%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1685774 Points -28%Oppo Find N3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1607165 Points -31%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1390723 Points -41%Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=146, last 2 years)
1333864 Points -43%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1322101 Points -44%PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (14862 - 27169, n=18)
20859 Points +39%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18026 Points +20%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17917 Points +20%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
16056 Points +7%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
16234 Points +8%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
14984 Points Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 27169, n=192, last 2 years)
14293 Points -5%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
12938 Points -14%Oppo Find N3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
11562 Points -23%BaseMark OS II
OverallAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (8155 - 14066, n=15)
11067 Points +18%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10120 Points +8%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9555 Points +2%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9347 Points Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
8400 Points -10%Oppo Find N3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
8283 Points -11%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
7637 Points -18%Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 14066, n=152, last 2 years)
7046 Points -25% SystemAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (10849 - 20776, n=15)
15472 Points +33%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
15087 Points +30%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
14552 Points +25%Oppo Find N3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
12736 Points +9%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
11637 Points Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11279 Points -3%Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 20776, n=152, last 2 years)
10842 Points -7%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
8038 Points -31% MemoryAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (7081 - 20572, n=15)
13158 Points +52%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11938 Points +38%Oppo Find N3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
10626 Points +23%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
10023 Points +16%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9073 Points +5%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
8647 Points Average of class Smartphone (962 - 20652, n=152, last 2 years)
7914 Points -8%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
7426 Points -14% GraphicsAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (35063 - 384996, n=15)
64212 Points +59%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
40383 Points Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
34612 Points -14%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
32352 Points -20%Oppo Find N3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
32334 Points -20%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
30845 Points -24%Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=152, last 2 years)
22829 Points -43%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
21728 Points -46% WebXiaomi Mix Fold 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1993 Points +9%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1983 Points +9%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1882 Points +3%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (1202 - 2363, n=15)
1879 Points +3%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1823 Points Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1717 Points -6%Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2363, n=152, last 2 years)
1634 Points -10%Oppo Find N3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1077 Points -41%UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
36048 Points +214%Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=143, last 2 years)
18691 Points +63%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17834 Points +56%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
17812 Points +55%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (8865 - 22767, n=13)
17467 Points +52%Oppo Find N3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
15837 Points +38%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12651 Points +10%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
11465 Points AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
213849 Points +27073%Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=128, last 2 years)
26916 Points +3320%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (787 - 307528, n=13)
25221 Points +3105%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
24087 Points +2961%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1434 Points +82%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
963 Points +22%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
787 Points Geekbench AI
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2Average of class Smartphone (123 - 13084, n=55, last 2 years)
1868 Points +212%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1126 Points +88%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (555 - 1708, n=15)
1121 Points +87%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
598 Points Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2Average of class Smartphone (51 - 9453, n=55, last 2 years)
1148 Points +333%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
492 Points +86%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (218 - 734, n=15)
490 Points +85%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
265 Points Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2Average of class Smartphone (51 - 2472, n=55, last 2 years)
508 Points +77%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (255 - 738, n=15)
503 Points +75%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
491 Points +71%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
287 Points AI Benchmark
Score V5Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
3199 Points Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
3092 Points Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=39, last 2 years)
949 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (137 - 287, n=4)
234 Points Score V6Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
11267 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (302 - 12784, n=12)
7937 Points -30%Average of class Smartphone (68.9 - 12578, n=55, last 2 years)
4310 Points -62%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1168 Points -90%
高通公司尚未提供有关 Adreno 830 的更多详细信息。 Adreno 830 的着色器数量或 7 核版本的时钟速度的更多细节。根据 Find N5 在 GFXBench 中的屏幕外得分，可以推测 GPU 也受到了限制。与其他手机相比，Oppo 手机的性能有时要低 20%。屏幕上的数值也使用了主显示屏。
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5955 Points Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4693 Points -21%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4411 Points -26%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4341 Points -27%Oppo Find N3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3628 Points -39%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2602 Points -56%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6089 Points Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4626 Points -24%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4235 Points -30%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4021 Points -34%Oppo Find N3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3687 Points -39%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2584 Points -58%3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25231 Points Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18997 Points -25%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18726 Points -26%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16021 Points -37%Oppo Find N3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
13998 Points -45%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9302 Points -63%3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9657 Points Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7402 Points -23%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7362 Points -24%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7290 Points -25%3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9565 Points Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7694 Points -20%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7487 Points -22%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7345 Points -23%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2007 Points Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1511 Points -25%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1503 Points -25%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1280 Points -36%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1043 Points -48%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1987 Points Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1633 Points -18%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1549 Points -22%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1457 Points -27%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1386 Points -30%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1093 Points -45%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%Oppo Find N3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
665 fps Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
503 fps -24%Oppo Find N3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
488 fps -27%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
437 fps -34%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
423 fps -36%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
398 fps -40%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps +95%Oppo Find N3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
375 fps +21%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
355 fps +14%Oppo Find N3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
346 fps +11%Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
311 fps Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
299 fps -4%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
253 fps -19%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps +85%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86 fps +43%Oppo Find N3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
288 fps Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps -14%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
236 fps -18%Oppo Find N3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
225 fps -22%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
196 fps -32%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
167 fps -42%GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps +48%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps +12%Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps -2%Oppo Find N3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps -12%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -18%GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
187 fps Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
151 fps -19%Oppo Find N3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
128 fps -32%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
122 fps -35%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps -35%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps -58%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps +26%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps 0%Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -4%Oppo Find N3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
43 fps -19%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps -28%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
87 fps Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75 fps -14%Oppo Find N3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps -21%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps -22%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -31%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -49%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps +35%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps +30%Oppo Find N3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
221 fps Oppo Find N3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
174 fps -21%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
173 fps -22%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
133 fps -40%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
123 fps -44%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps -51%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38 fps Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps -8%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps -18%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
33 fps -13%Oppo Find N3Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps -18%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
27 fps -29%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps -47%
在日常使用中，Find N5 的浏览器速度完全没有问题，网站加载迅速，滚动流畅。不过，这款可折叠手机在浏览器基准测试中的成绩不佳。
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (75.1 - 289, n=14)
211 Points +43%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)
172.212 Points +17%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
155.837 Points +5%Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)
147.767 Points Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=156, last 2 years)
141.4 Points -4%Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)
117.483 Points -20%Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
87.027 Points -41%Honor Magic V3 (Performance Mode, Chrome 128)
64.069 Points -57%Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120)
62.738 Points -58%Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (244 - 419, n=6)
362 runs/min +48%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)
308 runs/min +26%Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)
244 runs/min Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
237 runs/min -3%Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)
182 runs/min -25%Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 585, n=138, last 2 years)
179.9 runs/min -26%Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
115 runs/min -53%Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (15.3 - 34, n=12)
24.1 runs/min +58%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)
16.5 runs/min +8%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
15.7 runs/min +3%Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)
15.3 runs/min Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)
14.9 runs/min -3%Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=104, last 2 years)
12.7 runs/min -17%Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
6.53 runs/min -57%WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
211 Points +34%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)
189 Points +20%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (125 - 255, n=13)
179.5 Points +14%Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)
157 Points Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=150, last 2 years)
132.7 Points -15%Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)
112 Points -29%Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
69 Points -56%Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120)
28 Points -82%Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (25448 - 95506, n=17)
74566 Points +63%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
66754 Points +46%Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)
62374 Points +37%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)
50938 Points +12%Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)
45665 Points Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
44560 Points -2%Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
27245 Points -40%Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120)
21928 Points -52%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
2065.6 ms * -136%Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120)
1762.4 ms * -102%Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=159, last 2 years)
1303 ms * -49%Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)
873.45 ms * Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)
710.4 ms * +19%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
554.57 ms * +37%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)
545.6 ms * +38%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (383 - 873, n=14)
523 ms * +40%* ... smaller is better
在存储方面，Find N5 的高吞吐率给人留下了深刻印象。这款 OPPO 手机采用了 UFS 4.0 标准，读写速度非常快。
Oppo Find N5Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Honor Magic V3Oppo Find N3Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-5-26%-14%23%27%15%21%-20% Sequential Read 256KB3437.471827.6 -47%4115.34 20%3984.91 16%3825.59 11%3098.47 -10%3679 ?(1851 - 4512, n=46) 7%2144 ?(270 - 4384, n=187, last 2 years) -38% Sequential Write 256KB3251.981126.34 -65%2083.25 -36%3073.45 -5%3393.12 4%2863.35 -12%3102 ?(1524 - 4030, n=46) -5%1737 ?(103.2 - 4030, n=187, last 2 years) -47% Random Read 4KB269.51263.31 -2%398.01 48%369.73 37%365.48 36%351.92 31%382 ?(250 - 504, n=46) 42%293 ?(47.6 - 504, n=187, last 2 years) 9% Random Write 4KB339.32376.94 11%45.73 -87%485.32 43%527.68 56%505.81 49%469 ?(45.7 - 964, n=46) 38%334 ?(9.4 - 964, n=187, last 2 years) -2%
游戏 - Oppo Find N5 只能达到 90fps我们分析了已安装的 Adreno GPU 除了基准软件包之外，我们还仔细研究了当前的Android 游戏。通过我们的合作伙伴GameBench作为示例，我们确定了 Play Store 中两款游戏的准确帧率。为此，我们使用了更大的内置屏幕。
毫无疑问，使用大尺寸 OLED 面板玩游戏非常有趣，但游戏玩家可能应该给 Find N5 留个 "后路"。首先，100fps 以上的 HFR 游戏是不可能实现的；其次，在要求苛刻的游戏（如《源氏冲击》）中，Oppo 手机的帧速率会迅速大幅下降。
源泉冲击
PUBG 手机
Oppo Find N5; Genshin Impact: Ø40.6 (34-60) Oppo Find N5; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø89.1 (85-90) Oppo Find N5; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (43-60) Oppo Find N5; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.8 (34-41)
排放 - Oppo 智能手机有一个热点温度在 3DMark 压力测试中，Find N5 散发的热量明显导致系统性能下降。我们测得的节流率约为 50%。在使用 Burnout 基准测试的负载情况下，机箱表面温度变化很大，但即使在热点区域也保持在非关键水平。
Max. LoadIdle
47.9 °C43.1 °C39.7 °C 37.8 °C36.6 °C30.8 °C 30 °C29.8 °C29.6 °C
Maximum: 47.9 °CAverage: 36.1 °C
35.5 °C39.6 °C41.2 °C33 °C38 °C45.4 °C28.2 °C28.3 °C30.3 °C
Maximum: 45.4 °CAverage: 35.5 °C Power Supply (max.) 42.3 °C | Room Temperature 19.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
30.3 °C27.6 °C27.3 °C 28.6 °C27.5 °C26.6 °C 26.5 °C26.7 °C26.6 °C
Maximum: 30.3 °CAverage: 27.5 °C
26.5 °C28 °C28 °C26.5 °C26.7 °C28 °C25.8 °C26 °C26.3 °C
Maximum: 28 °CAverage: 26.9 °C Power Supply (max.) 39.6 °C | Room Temperature 19.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.9 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad stress test
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test StabilityGoogle Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.7 % +40%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67.2 % +20%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.2 % +6%Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56.1 % Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54 % -4% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.9 % +42%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76.5 % +41%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.5 % +8%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.9 % +3%Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.3 % Solar Bay Stress Test StabilitySamsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69.7 % +22%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 % +1%Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.2 % Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.3 % -14% Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityGoogle Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82.5 % +42%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71.7 % +23%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
70.5 % +21%Oppo Find N5Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.3 % Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.5 % -5%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22.4 (19.1-35.1) Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18.5 (17-30.4) Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø87.1 (72.8-129.9) Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø58.5 (52.4-97.2) Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø24.8 (18.7-32.7) Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø16.4 (14-28.3) Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø11.2 (9.05-15.5) Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø8.15 (7.05-12.7)
发言人耳机可通过 USB 端口连接。喜欢使用蓝牙进行无线播放的用户可以从多种编解码器中进行选择。
Oppo 智能手机的立体声扬声器音质非常好，即使超高频缺乏深度。不过，扬声器还是能产生很有深度的低音。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Oppo Find N5 audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Oppo Find N3 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 - Oppo Find N5 充电迅速耗电量尽管机身极为纤薄，Oppo 仍将 N3 的电池容量大幅提升至 5,600 毫安时。电池的最大充电功率为 80 瓦，支持最高 50 瓦的无线充电。使用适当的电源适配器，充电过程只需不到 50 分钟。
我们使用大尺寸主屏幕测量了耗电量。对于一款 XXL 可折叠手机来说，1.4 瓦的能耗相对较低，尤其是在空闲运行时。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.1 / 0.2 WattIdle 0.9 / 1.4 / 1.9 Watt
Load
7.2 / 12.8 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Oppo Find N55600 mAhGoogle Pixel 9 Pro Fold4650 mAhSamsung Galaxy Z Fold64400 mAhXiaomi Mix Fold 45100 mAhHonor Magic V35150 mAhOppo Find N34805 mAhAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Average of class Smartphone Power Consumption-57%-15%-22%10%-19%-9%7%Idle Minimum *0.91.28 -42%0.83 8%1.5 -67%1.12 -24%1.16 -29%1.039 ?(0.49 - 3.8, n=18) -15%0.869 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=157, last 2 years) 3%Idle Average *1.42.99 -114%1.3 7%1.9 -36%1.58 -13%1.8 -29%1.599 ?(0.87 - 4.2, n=18) -14%1.427 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=157, last 2 years) -2%Idle Maximum *1.93.32 -75%1.44 24%2.6 -37%1.66 13%1.84 3%1.83 ?(0.94 - 4.8, n=18) 4%1.588 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=157, last 2 years) 16%Load Average *7.27.25 -1%13.57 -88%5.8 19%5.9 18%10.98 -53%8.86 ?(5.8 - 13, n=15) -23%7.16 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=144, last 2 years) 1%Load Maximum *12.819.46 -52%16.03 -25%11.2 12%5.94 54%11.1 13%12.5 ?(8.86 - 19.5, n=15) 2%10.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=144, last 2 years) 16%* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.45 (0.936-14.7) Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.76 (0.831-5.43) Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.06 (0.858-1.877) Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.775 (1.53-2.66)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.64 (6.86-11.6) Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.67 (5.26-11.2) Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.06 (0.858-1.877) Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.775 (1.53-2.66)
电池运行时间Find N5 配备 8.12 英寸显示屏，显示亮度调整为 150 cd/m²，作为一款可折叠手机，它的续航能力非常出色--在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，它的续航时间接近 22 小时。这也是可折叠手机竞争中落后的地方，例如 Honor Magic V3在连续播放视频时，它甚至能坚持 15 个小时。由于采用了更小的外置面板，Find N5 的总时长还能再增加几个小时，这将使我们进入破纪录的领域。
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
36h 41min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 135)
21h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
31h 53min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 45min
Oppo Find N55600 mAhGoogle Pixel 9 Pro Fold4650 mAhSamsung Galaxy Z Fold64400 mAhXiaomi Mix Fold 45100 mAhHonor Magic V35150 mAhOppo Find N34805 mAhBattery Runtime-33%-30%-18%-32%-34%Reader / Idle22012067 -6%1692 -23%H.26419131421 -26%1043 -45%WiFi v1.31306879 -33%913 -30%968 -26%830 -36%861 -34%Load285244 -14%223 -22%
Notebookcheck 总体评分Oppo Find N5 是一款轻巧、舒适、超薄的迷你平板电脑，尽管其尺寸与普通智能手机相当。
Back to the verdict
Oppo Find N5
- 03/27/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Chassis90%
Keyboard73 / 75 → 97%
Pointing Device95%
Connectivity66 / 69 → 96%
Weight88%
Battery93%
Display91%
Games Performance38 / 55 → 70%
Application Performance72 / 85 → 85%
AI Performance18%
Temperature89%
Noise100%
Audio73 / 90 → 81%
Camera83%
Average69%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials25%Packaging75%Power Use95.9%Repairability45%Software Updates78.3% Total Sustainability Score: 53.2%
Possible alternatives compared
ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightDriveDisplay
1.87%Oppo Find N5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: 1. $9.96Kepuch Screen Protector Comp...2. $12.68Puccy 4 Pack Screen Protecto...3. $6.07FZZSZS (3-Pack for Oppo Find...List Price: 1577€229 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash8.12"2480x2248412 PPIAMOLED
2.84.4%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘16 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: 1. $1,799.00Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - Un...2. $24.82Ferilinso 2 Pack Screen Prot...3. $1,069.99Google Pixel 9 Pro XL - Unlo...List Price: 1899€257 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash8.00"2152x2076374 PPIOLED LTPO
3.86.1%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: 1. $38.95Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 S Pe...2. $41.88Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 S Pe...3. $1,199.00SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold5 AI Ph...List Price: 2119€239 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.60"2160x1856375 PPIAMOLED, HDR - HDR10+, HGL, 2nd Screen: 6.3", 2376x968, Glass Victus 2
4.85.3%Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: 1. $27.19JSAUX Cup Holder Universal M...2. $9.99MOOISVS [2Pack for Xiaomi Mi...3. $21.88YOUULAR [3 Pack Screen Prote...List Price: 1250€226 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.98"2488x2224418 PPIAMOLED LPTO
5.86.3%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: 1. $9.99MOOISVS [2+2Pack for Honor M...2. $9.96Kepuch Screen Protector Comp...3. $7.99Anbzsign 2+2Pack for Honor M...List Price: 2000€226 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.92"2344x2156402 PPIOLED
6.88.3% v7 (old)Oppo Find N3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 740 ⎘16 GB Memory, 1024 GB Amazon: 1. $20.68AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr...2. $16.20Kainevy Phone Case for Oppo ...3. $15.95IPG for Oppo Find N3 Flip Sm...List Price: 1800€239 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash7.82"2440x2268426 PPIOLED
More articles related to this deviceOppo Find N5 (Find N Series)Review•Oppo Find N3 翻盖智能手机评测--配备三摄像头的可折叠手机 |Review•Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测--没有恼人折痕的高端可折叠手机 [Oneplus Open] (简体中文)
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 142 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 570786 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!